Uganda National Household Survey 2012_2013
Uganda, 2012 - 2013
Created on
Feb 14, 2018
Last modified
Feb 14, 2018
Page views
60750
Identification
Survey ID Number
UGA-UBOS-UBOS-2012-v01
Title
Uganda National Household Survey 2012_2013
Country
| Name | Country code |
|---|---|
| Uganda | UGA |
Study type
Socio-Economic/Monitoring Survey [hh/sems]
Series Information
The Uganda National Household Survey 2012/2013 is the fifth in a series of consumption surveys conducted by Uganda Bureau of Statistics.The Uganda National Household Survey is nationally representative and it was designed to provide estimates for the whole country, urban and rural areas, and for ten (10) sub-regions.
Abstract
The Uganda National Household Survey 2012/13 is the latest in a series of household surveys that Uganda Bureau of Statistics has undertaken. The survey collected information on socio-economic characteristics at both household and community levels. The main objective of the survey was to collect high quality data on demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of households for monitoring development performance of key indicators in the various sectors.
The UNHS 2012/13 comprised of four modules namely: the SocioEconomic, Labour Force, Community, and Market price modules. The survey collected much more information besides what has been included in the final report; which is useful for informing policy formulation and overall development planning.
The UBOS calls upon all stakeholders to utilise the wealth of available data collected over the years to undertake in-depth analysis so as to better inform future policy debate.
The UNHS 2012/13 comprised of four modules namely: the SocioEconomic, Labour Force, Community, and Market price modules. The survey collected much more information besides what has been included in the final report; which is useful for informing policy formulation and overall development planning.
The UBOS calls upon all stakeholders to utilise the wealth of available data collected over the years to undertake in-depth analysis so as to better inform future policy debate.
Kind of Data
Sample survey data [ssd]
Unit of Analysis
The units of analysis for the Uganda National Household Survey 2012/2013 are: individuals, households, and communities.
Version
Version Description
- v1.2: Edited data, second version, for internal use only
Version Date
2014-02-28
Scope
Notes
The scope of the Uganda National Household Survey 2012/2013 includes:
1. The Socio-economic module covered household characteristics which include: housing conditions, household assets, incomes, loans, household expenditure, welfare indicators, cultural participation of household members and non-crop farming enterprises. The module also covered individual characteristics of household members namely education, literacy, health status and health seeking behavior of household members.
2. The Labour force module focused on data that is used to estimate the total labour force as well as derive other labour related indicators. The questionnaire focused on the activity status of persons aged five years and above, unemployment and those not in the labour force; employment; hours of work, earnings and care labour activities.
3. The Community Survey module focused on information about the general characteristics of the community (LC I); access to community facilities; community services and other amenities; economic infrastructure; agriculture and markets; education and health
infrastructure.
4. The Market price module was undertaken to provide standard equivalents of non-standard units through weighing items sold in markets. This entailed visiting some markets in the sampled Enumeration Areas (EAs) and weighing the various items being sold. In
cases where there was no market/ trading centre, the market frequented most by the residents of the sampled EA would be visited and measurements taken. Different local prices and their non-standard units which in many cases are used in selling various items were collected in this module. Since the price and units of measurement for different items vary across regions and in some cases across districts, they were measured and an equivalent in standard units recorded.
1. The Socio-economic module covered household characteristics which include: housing conditions, household assets, incomes, loans, household expenditure, welfare indicators, cultural participation of household members and non-crop farming enterprises. The module also covered individual characteristics of household members namely education, literacy, health status and health seeking behavior of household members.
2. The Labour force module focused on data that is used to estimate the total labour force as well as derive other labour related indicators. The questionnaire focused on the activity status of persons aged five years and above, unemployment and those not in the labour force; employment; hours of work, earnings and care labour activities.
3. The Community Survey module focused on information about the general characteristics of the community (LC I); access to community facilities; community services and other amenities; economic infrastructure; agriculture and markets; education and health
infrastructure.
4. The Market price module was undertaken to provide standard equivalents of non-standard units through weighing items sold in markets. This entailed visiting some markets in the sampled Enumeration Areas (EAs) and weighing the various items being sold. In
cases where there was no market/ trading centre, the market frequented most by the residents of the sampled EA would be visited and measurements taken. Different local prices and their non-standard units which in many cases are used in selling various items were collected in this module. Since the price and units of measurement for different items vary across regions and in some cases across districts, they were measured and an equivalent in standard units recorded.
Topics
Keywords
| Keyword | Vocabulary | URI |
|---|---|---|
| Economics | CESSDA | Link |
Coverage
Geographic Coverage
National coverage.
Universe
The survey covered all de jure household members.
Producers and sponsors
Primary investigators
| Name | Affiliation |
|---|---|
| Uganda Bureau of Statistics | Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development |
Producers
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Economic Policy Research Centre | Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development | Data analysis |
| District Local Governments | Ministry of Local Government | Data collection support |
Funding Agency/Sponsor
| Name | Abbreviation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Government of Uganda | GoU | Funding of entire survey |
Sampling
Sampling Procedure
The 2012/13 UNHS sample was designed to allow for reliable estimation of key indicators at the national, rural-urban, regions levels and separately for 10 sub-regions. A two-stage stratified sampling design was used. At the first stage, Enumeration Areas (EAs) were grouped by districts and rural-urban location, then drawn using Probability Proportional to Size (PPS). At the second stage, households which are the Ultimate Sampling Units were drawn using Systematic Random Sampling.
A total of 750 EAs were selected using the 2012 Uganda Population and Housing Census Mapping Frame. These EAs were distributed to the 10 sub-regions in equal proportions with consideration of the rural-urban domains. The 10 sub-regions stratified on the basis of common sociodemographic characteristics were as follows:
1. Kampala (comprising of the entire Kampala City Council Authority (KCCA));
2. Central I (Kalangala, Masaka, Mpigi, Rakai, Sembabule, Wakiso, Lyantonde, Bukomansimbi, Butambala, Gomba, Kalungu and Lwengo);
3. Central II (Kiboga, Luwero, Mubende, Mukono, Nakasongola, Kayunga, Mityana, Nakaseke, Buikwe, Buvuma and Kyankwanzi);
4. East Central (Bugiri, Iganga, Jinja, Kamuli, Mayuge, Kaliro, Namutumba, Buyende and Luuka);
5. Eastern (Busia, Kapchorwa, Katakwi, Kumi, Mbale, Pallisa, Soroti, Tororo, Kaberamaido, Sironko, Amuria, Budaka, Buduuda, Bukedea, Bukwo, Butaleja, Manafwa, Bulambuli, Kibuku, Kween, Namayingo, Ngora and Serere);
6. Mid-Northern (Apac, Gulu, Kitgum, Lira, Pader, Amolatar, Amuru, Dokolo, Oyam, Agago, Alebtong, Kole, Lamwo, Nwoya and Otuke);
7. North-East (comprising the districts of Kotido, Moroto, Nakapiripirit, Abim, Kaabong, Amudat and Napak);
8. West-Nile (comprising the districts of Adjumani, Arua, Moyo, Nebbi, Yumbe, Koboko, Maracha and Zombo);
9. Mid-Western (comprising the districts of Bundibugyo, Hoima, Kabarole, Kasese, Kibaale, Masindi, Kamwenge, Kyenjojo, Buliisa, Kiryandongo, Kyegegwa and Ntoroko);
10. South Western (comprising the districts of Bushenyi, Kabale, Kisoro, Mbarara, Ntungamo, Rukungiri, Kanungu, Ibanda, Isingiro, Kiruhura, Buhweju, Mitooma, Rubirizi and Sheema).
At household level, the target was to interview 10 households per EA. This implied a total sample of 7,500 households.
A total of 750 EAs were selected using the 2012 Uganda Population and Housing Census Mapping Frame. These EAs were distributed to the 10 sub-regions in equal proportions with consideration of the rural-urban domains. The 10 sub-regions stratified on the basis of common sociodemographic characteristics were as follows:
1. Kampala (comprising of the entire Kampala City Council Authority (KCCA));
2. Central I (Kalangala, Masaka, Mpigi, Rakai, Sembabule, Wakiso, Lyantonde, Bukomansimbi, Butambala, Gomba, Kalungu and Lwengo);
3. Central II (Kiboga, Luwero, Mubende, Mukono, Nakasongola, Kayunga, Mityana, Nakaseke, Buikwe, Buvuma and Kyankwanzi);
4. East Central (Bugiri, Iganga, Jinja, Kamuli, Mayuge, Kaliro, Namutumba, Buyende and Luuka);
5. Eastern (Busia, Kapchorwa, Katakwi, Kumi, Mbale, Pallisa, Soroti, Tororo, Kaberamaido, Sironko, Amuria, Budaka, Buduuda, Bukedea, Bukwo, Butaleja, Manafwa, Bulambuli, Kibuku, Kween, Namayingo, Ngora and Serere);
6. Mid-Northern (Apac, Gulu, Kitgum, Lira, Pader, Amolatar, Amuru, Dokolo, Oyam, Agago, Alebtong, Kole, Lamwo, Nwoya and Otuke);
7. North-East (comprising the districts of Kotido, Moroto, Nakapiripirit, Abim, Kaabong, Amudat and Napak);
8. West-Nile (comprising the districts of Adjumani, Arua, Moyo, Nebbi, Yumbe, Koboko, Maracha and Zombo);
9. Mid-Western (comprising the districts of Bundibugyo, Hoima, Kabarole, Kasese, Kibaale, Masindi, Kamwenge, Kyenjojo, Buliisa, Kiryandongo, Kyegegwa and Ntoroko);
10. South Western (comprising the districts of Bushenyi, Kabale, Kisoro, Mbarara, Ntungamo, Rukungiri, Kanungu, Ibanda, Isingiro, Kiruhura, Buhweju, Mitooma, Rubirizi and Sheema).
At household level, the target was to interview 10 households per EA. This implied a total sample of 7,500 households.
Response Rate
The actual sample fully covered for the 2012/13UNHS was 6,887 households, with a response rate of 95 percent. The response rate was higher in rural areas (97%) compared to urban areas (92%).
Data Collection
Dates of Data Collection
| Start | End |
|---|---|
| 2012-06-01 | 2013-06-28 |
Data Collection Mode
Face-to-face [f2f]
Data Collection Notes
A centralized approach was employed during data collection whereby 12 mobile field teams hired at the headquarters were dispatched to different sampled areas. Each team comprised of one Supervisor, 3 to 4 Enumerators and a Driver. The field interviewers were recruited based on fluency of local language spoken in the respective regions of deployment.
Data Collectors
| Name | Abbreviation | Affiliation |
|---|---|---|
| Uganda Bureau of Statistics | UBOS | Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development |
Access policy
Contacts
| Name | Affiliation | URL | |
|---|---|---|---|
| James Muwonge | Uganda Bureau of Statistics | james.muwonge@ubos.org | www.ubos.org |
Confidentiality
Before being granted access to the dataset, all users have to formally agree:
1. To make no copies of any files or portions of files to which s/he is granted access except those authorized by the data depositor.
2. Not to use any technique in an attempt to learn the identity of any person, establishment, or sampling unit not identified on public use data files.
3. To hold in strictest confidence the identification of any establishment or individual that may be inadvertently revealed in any documents or discussion, or analysis. Such inadvertent identification revealed in her/his analysis will be immediately brought to the attention of the data depositor.
Access conditions
Licensed datasets, accessible under conditions
Citation requirements
"Uganda Bureau ofl Statistics (UBOS). 2014. Uganda National Household Survey 2012/2013. Kampala Uganda; UBOS, provided by the National Data Archive. www.ubos.org/unda"
Access authority
| Name | Affiliation | URL | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Uganda Bureau of Statistics | Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development | ubos@ubos.org | www.ubos.org |
Disclaimer and copyrights
Disclaimer
The user of the data acknowledges that the original collector of the data, the authorized distributor of the data, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.
Copyright
(c) 2014, Uganda Bureau of Statistics
Metadata production
DDI Document ID
DDI-UGA-UBOS-UBOS-2012-v01
Producers
| Name | Abbreviation | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|---|
| Uganda Bureau of Statistics | UBOS | Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development | Documentation of the survey |
Date of Metadata Production
2016-10-10
DDI Document version
Version 1.0 (October 2014). This is the first documentation of this survey.